It always has puzzled me that homosexuals would even have a political agenda. I consider homosexuality to be a sexual preference, as opposed to a race or gender. I realize that not everyone thinks the same as I do. But every homosexual individual in America has the right to be what he/she is… to live with a same sex partner, to share life together, to choose their sexual activities, as long as there is mutual consent and the practice is not harmful or destructive to others. Therefore, although I have heard every reason that homosexuals have for politicizing homosexuality, I still do not understand the point of redefining marriage to include homosexuality as the norm. Marriage was first instituted by the God of the Bible, who and which many homosexuals (mostly political activists) either disagree with or flatly despise. Why would marriage even be important to a homosexual if this is so? One would think that someone who doesn’t care what the Bible says also doesn’t care whether or not they are married. The main reason that people wish to marry is to do the right thing… in other words, recieve God’s approval or blessing on the union between two people.
The fact is, it is not the norm in America, and has never been the norm. The norm is marriage between a man and a woman. And I disagree with those that say my opinion is anti-progressive, but I believe it is actually destructive and harmful to society as a whole.
Here is why: If America redefines marriage by law to include homosexuality, it requires all people, by default, to include homosexuality as the norm. And if the religious leaders of churches who teach Judeo-Christian values (Biblical values to be precise), refuse to marry homosexuals for religious beliefs, they would likely be sued and possibly jailed for refusing to marry homosexual couples. It is already happening in some instances. A pastor was sued for refusing to marry a homosexual couple.
Consider the doctor who refused to perform a procedure due to her religious beliefs and made a referral. She was taken to court over it. To me, that is stupidity. The person refusing service clearly proved that it was not about the money, and the person demanding service would have just as easily been promoting her own pro-choice cause by simply accepting the referral and giving her business to someone willing to do the procedure. But a lawsuit? That is over the top.
Things like redefining marriage and such may cause religious do-gooders to resort to underground worship and religion practiced more secretly for fear of being forced to perform acts that cause them to go against their religion, rather than the homosexual community keeping its sexual activities private and personal, as it ought to be, and as heterosexuals do.
Do you see the injustice it imposes on others? I am a Christian. I don’t hate homosexuals. I love them, in fact, like I do all sweet people. I can’t say that I love what every sweet person does, however. And my Christian friends would say the same. But when it comes to push and shove, the pushing is on the part of the homosexual activists, not the religious zealots.
We all enjoy American freedom together, so far. Why should one group impose anything upon the other? We are not opposites or enemies, as some activists would like the rest of the world to believe. Homosexuals and religious people should respect each other’s beliefs and opinions. If a homosexual person were to tell me that homosexuality is normal, I would disagree. It doesn’t mean that I hate him/her. Likewise, if a religious person tells a homosexual person that homosexuality is a sin according to Biblical teachings, he/she would beg to differ as well. Homosexual activists should not hate Christians either. Yet I see name-calling all too often, and I’m certainly not placing all homosexuals in the same bucket. Many are beautiful people who are turned off by that kind of thing.
Believing that homosexuality is unnatural is not only a religious belief, but in some cases, a scientific opinion. Opinions are an American right. It is not hatred. It is a belief that is equal to the belief that homosexual people are just that… homosexual. Many believe that homosexuality is not by choice, but scientifically proven. Some scientists have claimed it is a physical thing, some scientists have claimed that there is no proof of that. So, we non-scientists are left to choose which story we believe. Homosexuals believe they are truly homosexual and that it isn’t a choice and that it is not a sin. And Christians and Jews believe that the practice of homosexuality is a choice and that it is a sin. These beliefs are equivalent. Both are a matter of what each group chooses to believe. But these beliefs do not prove that anyone in the mix is hateful, fearful (phobic), bigoted, or intolerant, whether religious because one chooses to believe the Bible or religious because one chooses to believe what some say about sexual orientation, that it is not a choice.
Yes, you heard the implication correctly… homosexuality has indeed become just as much a religion (set of beliefs) as Christianity and Judaism. But in spite of it all, we must respect the freedom and beliefs of all Americans. We have never lost our liberty to choose what we wish to believe… God forbid… or America would no longer be a free country. And the freedom to be what we want to be… to convert to Christianity or homosexuality, already exists. There is no need to legislate either one, whether that legislation is harmful or helpful to either cause, because we are all already at liberty to practice as we choose, and that’s the way it should remain.
I have to say that, ironically, I can relate to a homosexual’s “coming out” experience. When I became a Christian, I did so in secret, because my family was extremely liberal. And I didn’t tell anyone but my closest friends until four years later. That’s when I experienced not only the disappointment that homosexuals experience when their parents find out that they are gay, but I was the target of a great deal of name-calling, antagonism, harassment, and persecution… sadly, from my own family. I was naïve…. I expected them to be happy for me because, as a Christian, I was less likely to engage in activities that were simply not in my best interest, such as drug abuse, excessive drinking, premarital sex, cursing, dishonoring my parents, greed, murder… not that murder was an option for me before I believed in Christ, but I think you get the point.
The truth is that my family was afraid of what they didn’t know much about. They had collected these preconceived ideas of what it meant to be a Christian. We are all naturally inclined to do this. We would rather stick our heads in the sand sometimes. People who mock Christianity would rather listen to the hype, the media, and the left’s biases and definitions. I am convinced that many, not all, simply do not wish to know the truth about any religion. Religion often requires change. And change, when it involves the removal of well-known pleasures, is uncomfortable. Granted there is a lot to learn. But it is no excuse for dumping all religions into the same bag and attaching the label “hate.” In reality, Jesus Christ’s command to his disciples before his ascention was to love one another. And the Bible even defines love, saying that it is kind and patient… and to refute misinterpreting love, that verse makes it clear that love does not rejoice in iniquity, but it rejoices in the truth.
Another thing I have observed over the years… it used to upset me, but now it makes me chuckle a bit when it happens because I have grown to understand it better… is when someone who is not religious (usually one who carries religion in that hate bag) quotes the Bible to someone who is religious (ie: a Christian or a Jew) in the attempt to prove hypocrisy… when the person quoting the scriptures doesn’t even live by or believe in what they are quoting! Hello? I mean, think about it… will the real hypocrite please stand up!
Anyway, I’m sure that homosexuals often feel the same way that I did at my “coming out” with Christianity… persecuted, shamed, mocked… belittled and devalued. I understand that, I’m sorry it happens, and I wouldn’t do that. But according to what I see happening in social circles today, the scales tip in favor of homosexuals in comparison with Christians and Jews, because of today’s political propaganda that makes all religious people out to be villains that need to be stopped, even at the price of their own freedom. I have to ask… stopped from what? Praying for you? We certainly don’t walk around with bombs strapped to our bellies. We certainly don’t use violence to vandalize and litter the lawns of activists opposing our views or walk down the middle of San Fransisco half-naked while humping the air in front of families and children once a year. And unfortunately, the same people who wish to stop religion make homosexuals out to be gods who should receive special privileges; who shouldn’t be treated like normal, every-day, responsible, hardworking citizens with the same rights as everyone else, but should be granted extra privileges. They are free to call people like me names like homophobic, hateful, bigoted, or intolerant… not to mention the brash unmentionable ones. But I can’t wait to see the emoting responses to this article! Those will prove my point well enough.
And… as soon as that bill gets passed that criminalizes people for expressing their opinion –you know, the hate-crimes bill – they will not only equate religion with hatred, but eventually people will be thrown in jail simply by association; that is, for announcing themselves as practicing Jews or Christians.
Jail was intended for murderers and thieves, but that is no longer the opinion of the left. The left wants to legalize genocide (defined as abortion), put the government in control of everyone and everything, instead of the people (defined as socialism), and make criminals of all who disagree with them (both fascism and communism). The left’s agenda is to slowly pull the rug out from under Americans of faith (and/or common sense) in order to benefit small interest groups who are already just as privileged as everyone else.
This is why I fight to keep America free, for people of all beliefs, and this is why I am proud to be a Republican in 2008.
~ Jeanine Dyer
Tags: Add new tag, America, Bible, Christianity, conservative, Democrat, heterosexual, homosexuality, Judaism, Judeo-Christian, lawsuits, left-wing, liberal, marriage, pastor, politics, religion, Republican, right-wing, same-sex marriage, values
September 9, 2008 at 4:12 pm
I read your posting with interest. The following is not a shout – I know how email can sometimes come across. Some facts: being gay is not a choice – it’s like the color of your eyes. I don’t choose to be gay and the term sexual preference is misleading. Gay people don’t want special rights – where do you get this from? We want the equal treatment eg. to legally establish our relationships so that we have inheritance rights, hospital visitation rights, etc. -rights straight people have and take for granted. And “’scales tip in favor of homosexuals” – again….where do you get this from? Would you like to live in my shoes for a month and then repeat this statement with a straight face? Unlike so many of my fellow American’s, I am not interested in the labels Republican and Democrat. I am interested in determining which candidate would promote a kind, fair, equal society where people are allowed to live their lives without fear or favor. You are entitled to your religion . You are not entitled to pass laws, or contribute to the passing of laws, that make my life a misery. Even the Conservatives in Britain and Europe have managed to grasp this; equal rights have been awarded to gay people and the sky didn’t fall in – life just goes on there, as before, just fairer. Thanks for listening.
September 9, 2008 at 4:33 pm
first of all, it is not a choice. homosexuality has been found in animals in captivity as well as in the wild. secondly, gays do not want to take away from a heterosexual partnership. they just want to be equal. they want legal claims to estates, to see each other in the hospital, and sit down to raise a child if they choose. my nanny was a lesbian and i am with a man so do not believe that gays are recruiting. i know you didnt say that, but keep it in mind. also, if you read the kjv, nkjv, or living bible or any bible that was translated similarly. the alexandrian era of translation put rules in the bible that did not reflect the original text that reflected the social norms of the time. the bible also degrades women, but jesus didn’t. jesus loves all of his children equally. EQUALITY is key. gays don’t want you to worship in secret why would they. in fact i know gays and lesbians who love god and jesus with all of their heart and when going to heaven god will say “well done my good and faithful servant.” in heaven there is no such thing as gender or marriage. if you dont want people to view christians in a negative light, you have to stop posting things like this. it shows limited tolerance, and no acceptence or respect to the men and women who just want to be equal and love you they love. you dont have a choice in who you fall in love with. why persecute them for it then. they are not second class citizens they are first class. our nonchristian, masonic founding fathers said that everyone was created equal and should have equal rights. men in the 20s didn’t like that women wanted to vote, but we do and are some what equal no. i hopt in 80 years gays can say the same. stop being vanilla, add some rainbow in your life. i understand what you are trying to do, but wwjd? he would love and accept just as you are.
September 9, 2008 at 7:39 pm
You lost me at “Marriage was first instituted by the God of the Bible,”
You know this how?
September 9, 2008 at 8:36 pm
Have you ever done any research regarding the Bible? Have you read it?
Many proofs confirm the accuracy of the Bible.
Visit these sites to find out more:
http://www.squidoo.com/biblicalmanuscripts
http://www.squidoo.com/biblicalarchaeology
http://www.squidoo.com/messianicprophecy
Whether we conclude that it true or not, it is worth it to find out what we can about it, as we are talking life and death here. Take the time to read the Bible so that you will know exactly what it says.
Marriage is introduced in the book of Genesis and described in detail throughout as being between one woman and one man. If it were not so, it would have been recorded, as when you read it, you will see that, whether simply historical, or inspired by God, what is written in the Bible suggests that nothing of importance between God and man is left out.
September 9, 2008 at 9:29 pm
listen i am a senior in religious studies and i am going to get my doctorate from a seminary. yes i have read it! i have studied it! my dad was a pastor. you dont know the bible. there was no marriage in genesis! hello! maybe you need to get the consevative pastors that you listen to, to read the bible from a historical and cultural perspective. it doesn’t take away from the truth of the bible. oh and get a grip there was no adam and eve. it is a story! the hebrews even know that. that doesnt change the fact that i love god and god or even goddess(remember no gender) loves me too. i emplore you to trust god to do the judging let him/her be a big god. picking at little detals in humanity makes it seem like you serve a narrow minded small god. that is not my god and my god gave me life. god is love no matter who you want to love
September 9, 2008 at 10:25 pm
Look at your body… you did not make it. It was made according to the wishes of someone other than yourself.
Look at science… Your sex chromosomes existed and determined your sex at the moment of conception. Read Psalm 139. You were fearfully and wonderfully made.
No matter how hard we try, except it occurs in our minds, we cannot transform God into what we think He ought to be. Seek not to taylor the facts to a certain lifestyle. Seek to know God as He is, not as you hope He is. If the words you read in the scriptures seem to chastise you like they do to me, remember that it is written in those same scriputres that He chastises those He loves.
September 9, 2008 at 10:39 pm
Face it, the bible is a mish-mash of different writings, all by men, at different times and in different circumstances. The creation myth described in Genesis 1 probably comes from Babylonian sources. The science of the bible is at best rudimentary and no honest scholar would attempt to defend it (Augustine himself warned Christians against this).
To argue that the bible proves that God exists and that the bible itself expresses the opinion of God is simply incorrect and will expose you to derision wherever you attempt to use this argument.
Moreover one could argue that the First Book of Samuel (see 1 Sam 18) demonstrates a case for civil unions. Not that I would suggest that you continue to rely on biblical sources for determination of truth, just to demonstrate that even that source writes sensitively and approvingly of intimate same-sex relations.
September 10, 2008 at 1:12 am
sensitively and approvingly of intimate same-sex relations? Ha… What a bunch of wishful emoting!
You are certainly no Biblical scholar, that’s for sure.
My beliefs are based on facts uncovered by years of research and study.
Read the information at the links I provided in the previous post.
For the record:
1 Samuel 18 is used by homosexual rights groups to argue that David and Jonathan were gay. It doesn’t say that. It says that Jonathan loved David and that their relationship was a strong friendship… they bonded in spirit, not physically. God’s favor toward David was a result of David’s heart toward God, which was seen in his ability to lead people, not in any of his personal human relationships, becuase God had already announced through a prophet that David would one day be the King of Israel.
After David slew Golaith, King Saul was afraid of David because he knew that God was with him. Then Saul’s jealousy caused them to be enemies for the rest of his life.
September 10, 2008 at 11:40 am
It is impossible to debate with someone who is fundamentalist. Your original post attempts to paint you as a loving and generous Christian but let’s face it, at heart, you are really in the same category as an Islamic fanatic. The reason we refer to religion as ‘faith’ is because there is no proof. You can site as many references as you like for people to read, faith will never be fact. May i suggest you and the presidential candidates concentrate on the economy, America’s shattered international reputation, alternative energy sources, health care for all, improved educational resources, and trying to restore the USAs reputation as being an international law abiding nation. The gays living next door to you who simply want to ‘get hitched’ for legal reasons and their pride won’t have the slightest detrimental effect on our country, your personal life, the economy, the weather etc. One more thing…If you are not gay, why are you so obsessed with this issue? It’s a little spooky actually.
September 10, 2008 at 4:09 pm
Thanks and congratulation Jeanine. You have passed the test of bible haters. They threw every insult they could towards you, the scriptures, God and the male-female institution of marriage. But you held your ground.
This is how it is. These people though we love them, hate God and his law and they will never acknowledge that hate. They instead choose you as a surrogate target and dump on you.
So again congratulations and stay strong. Be like Nehemiah, dont come down from the wall.
September 10, 2008 at 5:50 pm
Thank you, gcmwatch, for your initiation! I expected this kind of rhetoric… its nothing new. Congratulations back to you… you are the first sincere person to respond to this article!
To Chris ~ Had you clicked through to the suggested sites in my first reply, you may have noticed that I’m already giving attention to many other issues of importance in America.
And… This is just my first blog here. You aint seen nothin’ yet!
September 10, 2008 at 6:08 pm
A 1993 article: http://fathersforlife.org/gay_issues/gay_gene.htm
A 2008 article: http://www.trueorigin.org/gaygene01.asp
September 10, 2008 at 8:32 pm
I think you’ve got a problem here, whitu4ever. At no point did I say anything about homosexuality in the bible. I said, correctly, that the bible writes sensitively and with approval about intimate same-sex relations. The bible may well disapprove of certain forms of sex but it approves of same sex unions in the highest possible terms.
It’s also interesting how Christians are so selective about which parts of Deuteronomy or Leviticus they cite. Deut 22:11 “You shall not wear a material mixed of wool and linen together.” And all that nonsense about stoning people to death on the slightest provocation.
If you don’t agree with some bits of the bible, don’t follow them. But don’t be surprised when you find that other people wilfully ignore what you claim is “God’s word”. You’re guilty of the same sin yourself.
September 10, 2008 at 11:14 pm
Dear, if you’re talking about marriage within particular churches, fine. But when you are talking about CIVIL marriage, that which is approved by the SECULAR government, your deity’s law matters not. It isn’t supposed to. Under the Constitution ALL are to be treated equally — no Jim Crow, no separate but equal, but equally. If you have a legal right to civil marriage, so should I. Period. And if your church tells me I cannot have a religious marriage there, well, the church gets to decide what happens within it. But no — you and your church should not be able to demand that the government follow your religious tenets to govern and PUNISH those who aren’t members of your church. That’s un-American, and so long as the US bends over to serve your God, America is a lying heap of trash that should stop crowing about equality and what a great nation it is. Until there is full equality for all under law, this construct isn’t worth the paper on which the Constitution is printed.
September 11, 2008 at 12:42 am
Religious people have as much of a right to influence government as non-religious people do. Devout religious men wrote the constitution… it was a group of people with an extremely moral conscience that was highly influenced by the Bible (the Bible was a part of their school curriculum while growing up) that made the decision to form an equality-based government which provided us our freedom to be uniquely who we are.
If God exists, He matters… It would do you well to find out as much as you can about that.
You said, “…so long as the US bends over to serve your God, America is a lying heap of trash…”
Do you include yourself as an American lying heap of trash, or are you above the rest? Anyway… thanks, you just demonstrated the name-calling issue beautifully.
September 11, 2008 at 2:30 am
Homosexuality is a choice. There is no proof that it is genetic. Whituforever is actually not following Christianity by basically saying, “they have a right to do what they do”. The right they have may be a constitutional right but morally they are infringing the rights of Christianity, Judeism, etc. We can not be 1/2 for God. As Jesus said, “Either you are with me or against me.”
September 11, 2008 at 5:28 am
Nice try, josephudo…
From the Merriam Webster online dictionary:
impostor
Main Entry: im·pos·tor
Variant(s): or im·pos·ter \im-ˈpäs-tər\
Function: noun
Etymology: Late Latin impostor, from Latin imponere
Date: 1564
: one that assumes false identity or title for the purpose of deception
The verse you are referring to says, “He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters.” It is found in Mathew 12 and Luke 11.
September 11, 2008 at 6:06 am
I hate to use Whitu4ever’s blog to have a go at Josephudo, but did he really say what I thought he said?
Two people of the same sex who, like David and Jonathan in 1 Samuel 18, become “one in spirit”, share a household and make a covenent because they love one another as themselves, is “morally…infringing the rights of Christianity, Judeism, etc”?
Firstly that’s a bit of blatant biblical illiteracy.
Secondly it’s ridiculous. Ludicrous. If you don’t want to be involved in a gay marriage, don’t get involved. But don’t stupidly insist that you have a moral right to control somebody else who doesn’t even share your religion. What next, you’ll be defending the “moral right” of Muslims to make women cover themselves from head to toe?
September 11, 2008 at 5:30 pm
Mr. Sidaway, by suggesting that David and Jonathan are same-sex partners or homosexual, you are clearly demonstrating Biblical illiteracy while accusing others of the same. In the Bible, David did not share a household with Jonathan by choice. It says as plain as day that David was forced to stay because of King Saul, Jonathan’s father, to work for the king. (In those days, you didn’t have the option of saying no to the king.) But nowhere does it say that David and Jonathan shared a bed or had sex.
September 11, 2008 at 5:58 pm
Well they were undeniably same-sex partners. Modern concepts like homosexuality, I’m not sure they fit here.
“Jonathan became one in spirit with David, and he loved him as himself” is clear enough. There was no coercion by Saul in this.
“Jonathan took off the robe he was wearing and gave it to David, along with his tunic, and even his sword, his bow and his belt..” The meaning of this is quite clear, too.
Sharing a bed or having sex is beside the point. They were partners.
Again and again you can try to say that David and Jonathan only bonded because of the king. They did not. They became one in spirit, and loved one another as themselves. That’s an intimate same-sex relationship, and it’s in the bible.
September 11, 2008 at 6:14 pm
gcmwatch agrees with and compliments you whitu4ever and that automatically makes them ’sincere’. Now that’s balanced debate for you. I’m deciding to withdraw from this blog because it’s mean spirited..despite all the smiley faces. My gay partner and I both have school children to teach, a Saturday youth club to run, a community organisation helping the elderly to help administer and an extended heterosexual family to support, as 3 of them are unemployed and there are 3 grandchildren without financial support. These are hopefully the sorts of contributions that make the world a happier,kinder place to live in. You continue to spend your time hurling biblical scripture around,putting people in their place and pointing fingers. It obviously brings you and your compatriots great joy and satisfaction.
September 12, 2008 at 2:03 am
I’ll say a prayer for everyone who has taken the time to share their thoughts here on my blog. I have much to attend to myself. Thanks for talking with me, all of you, and I sincerely mean it.
God bless and good night.
September 13, 2008 at 2:35 pm
I was reading a book today, written about the life of Rich Mullins. The writer pointed out that God doesn’t hate anyone… He IS love. Therefore, He loves us all. People don’t go to heaven or hell because of what they do. We go to hell for rejecting the grace he so longs to give us.
This is what makes God so great! It is based upon His ways and His thoughts, not ours. I so love Yeshua. And He loves us… SO much!
September 13, 2008 at 4:33 pm
The purpose of this blog is not to preach Jesus or the Bible, although conversations have led in that direction simply because certain posts took it in that direction. The purpose of this blog is to share my political opinion and reasoning, a Christian perspective and one of many, on what homosexual activists and the far left are trying to pass, and how it will effect Christian professionals and all Christians in one way or another.
Let me share with you some examples of what is already happening in America and all over the world to Christians because of the abortion issue, and because of the same-sex marriage issue… Christians are being fired, the companies they worked for and the individuals are being sued, and companies that have just as much a right to exist as any other are being put out of business over these issues… take a look:
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/mar/07030111.html
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2004_May_7/ai_n6016654
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2001_Jan_24/ai_69438642
http://www.christian.org.uk/news/20080911/gmc-rejects-complaint-against-pro-life-gp/
http://www.christian.org.uk/news/20080912/equality-police-will-target-faith-groups/
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=11383
http://www.afterabortion.org/PAR/V8/n1/coercedabortions.html
http://wonderofnow.blogspot.com/2008/02/news-christian-photographer-sued-for.html
http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_pastors30.3da47af.html
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=66704
http://www.contracostatimes.com/ci_10291946
http://www.idahoexaminer.com/columns/9550/even-npr-acknowledges-gay-marriage-threat-to-religious-liberty
http://www.limandrilaw.com/CM/Custom/C%20%20LiMandri’s%20Marriage%20Presentation.ppt#4
It rubs me the wrong way when Christian organizations are all about loving, giving, helping, charity work, etc. Yet for all the good they do, they are discriminated against and hated back, and expected to just sit there and take it. That can’t happen. We can’t just sit back and take it. We must defend ourselves and exercise boundaries against injustices done toward us as well. We are just as important as anyone else. Not more, not less. To fight back legally is not anti-Christian behavior. That is not only an American right, but a God-given right. We do our best to respect others, but when mistreated, ultimately, we must obey God rather than man.
September 15, 2008 at 9:04 pm
Good Job Jeanine… you certainly held your ground. People around us see only what they want to and your job was only to plant the seed. Its up to them to run with it and help it grow. But you did your part and thats all you could do.
Kudos.
September 22, 2008 at 6:12 pm
Gay Rights: A Summary of the Debate
There are several basic aspects to the cultural debate surrounding homosexual behavior. Here is a brief summary from a Christian perspective.
Fairness
Christians, especially, are sensitive to the issue of fairness. Most sincere Christians have the biblical attitude that we are all sinners and we all have our struggles, straight or gay. We are each one, not just a little bit sinful on the edges—we are deeply depraved, with sin touching every aspect of our being. So in terms of our sinful nature, we are all in this together. Thus, Christians recognize that people in a homosexual lifestyle are people, made in the image of God, who should be treated fairly by all.
Admittedly, it is not a perfect world and some may have an “us versus them” mentality which is decidedly unbiblical and wrong. To the extent that some people, in the name of Christianity, have fostered a hateful attitude toward any group of people, we sincerely apologize.
While it is very important to strive for fairness for everyone, it is equally important to consider an important concept: While all people are created equal, not all ideas or behaviors are equal. There is, in fact, a hierarchy of ideas. This is intuitively obvious, as well as biblically obvious. And it is the place at which we must begin. It is the key statement that must be made in this debate.
In the area of human sexuality, for example, adultery is not morally equivalent to fidelity. Prostitution is not morally equivalent to sex with love. Fornication is not morally equivalent to the virtue of chastity.
What it says
There are claims that the Bible does not really condemn homosexual behavior or that Jesus would not condemn this behavior. But let’s look at what the Bible actually says.
The Bible contains 9 specific references to homosexuality: 4 in the Old Testament:
Genesis 19:1-25 (NIV)
1 The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of the city. When he saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground. 2 “My lords,” he said, “please turn aside to your servant’s house. You can wash your feet and spend the night and then go on your way early in the morning.”
“No,” they answered, “we will spend the night in the square.”
3 But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. 4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom—both young and old—surrounded the house. 5 They called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them.”
6 Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him 7 and said, “No, my friends. Don’t do this wicked thing. 8 Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don’t do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof.”
9 “Get out of our way,” they replied. And they said, “This fellow came here as an alien, and now he wants to play the judge! We’ll treat you worse than them.” They kept bringing pressure on Lot and moved forward to break down the door.
10 But the men inside reached out and pulled Lot back into the house and shut the door. 11 Then they struck the men who were at the door of the house, young and old, with blindness so that they could not find the door.
12 The two men said to Lot, “Do you have anyone else here—sons-in-law, sons or daughters, or anyone else in the city who belongs to you? Get them out of here, 13 because we are going to destroy this place. The outcry to the LORD against its people is so great that he has sent us to destroy it.”
14 So Lot went out and spoke to his sons-in-law, who were pledged to marry his daughters. He said, “Hurry and get out of this place, because the LORD is about to destroy the city!” But his sons-in-law thought he was joking.
15 With the coming of dawn, the angels urged Lot, saying, “Hurry! Take your wife and your two daughters who are here, or you will be swept away when the city is punished.”
16 When he hesitated, the men grasped his hand and the hands of his wife and of his two daughters and led them safely out of the city, for the LORD was merciful to them. 17 As soon as they had brought them out, one of them said, “Flee for your lives! Don’t look back, and don’t stop anywhere in the plain! Flee to the mountains or you will be swept away!”
18 But Lot said to them, “No, my lords, please! 19 Your servant has found favor in your eyes, and you have shown great kindness to me in sparing my life. But I can’t flee to the mountains; this disaster will overtake me, and I’ll die. 20 Look, here is a town near enough to run to, and it is small. Let me flee to it—it is very small, isn’t it? Then my life will be spared.”
21 He said to him, “Very well, I will grant this request too; I will not overthrow the town you speak of. 22 But flee there quickly, because I cannot do anything until you reach it.” (That is why the town was called Zoar.)
23 By the time Lot reached Zoar, the sun had risen over the land. 24 Then the LORD rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah—from the LORD out of the heavens. 25 Thus he overthrew those cities and the entire plain, including all those living in the cities—and also the vegetation in the land.
Judges 19:22-30
22 While they were enjoying themselves, some of the wicked men of the city surrounded the house. Pounding on the door, they shouted to the old man who owned the house, “Bring out the man who came to your house so we can have sex with him.”
23 The owner of the house went outside and said to them, “No, my friends, don’t be so vile. Since this man is my guest, don’t do this disgraceful thing. 24 Look, here is my virgin daughter, and his concubine. I will bring them out to you now, and you can use them and do to them whatever you wish. But to this man, don’t do such a disgraceful thing.”
25 But the men would not listen to him. So the man took his concubine and sent her outside to them, and they raped her and abused her throughout the night, and at dawn they let her go. 26 At daybreak the woman went back to the house where her master was staying, fell down at the door and lay there until daylight.
27 When her master got up in the morning and opened the door of the house and stepped out to continue on his way, there lay his concubine, fallen in the doorway of the house, with her hands on the threshold. 28 He said to her, “Get up; let’s go.” But there was no answer. Then the man put her on his donkey and set out for home.
29 When he reached home, he took a knife and cut up his concubine, limb by limb, into twelve parts and sent them into all the areas of Israel. 30 Everyone who saw it said, “Such a thing has never been seen or done, not since the day the Israelites came up out of Egypt. Think about it! Consider it! Tell us what to do!”
Leviticus 18:22
Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.
Leviticus 20:13
If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.
And 5 in the New Testament:
Romans 1:24-28
24Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
28 Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
1 Timothy 1:8-11
8 We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. 9 We also know that law is made not for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious; for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 for adulterers and perverts, for slave traders and liars and perjurers—and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine 11 that conforms to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me.
2 Peter 2:6-10
6 if he condemned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah by burning them to ashes, and made them an example of what is going to happen to the ungodly; 7 and if he rescued Lot, a righteous man, who was distressed by the filthy lives of lawless men 8 (for that righteous man, living among them day after day, was tormented in his righteous soul by the lawless deeds he saw and heard)— 9 if this is so, then the Lord knows how to rescue godly men from trials and to hold the unrighteous for the day of judgment, while continuing their punishment. 10 This is especially true of those who follow the corrupt desire of the sinful nature and despise authority.
Jude 1:7
In a similar way, Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding towns gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion. They serve as an example of those who suffer the punishment of eternal fire.
The passage in Romans, in particular is so clear that it seems to have been written by St. Paul in anticipation that people might challenge the idea that homosexual behavior is wrong (in case you don’t get it, let me make it perfectly clear!). In addition, there are numerous other passages that touch on this topic indirectly through comments on the biblical view of marriage and family, promiscuity, and sexual purity. Included in these references are:
Genesis 2:18-25
18 The LORD God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.”
19 Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. 20 So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds of the air and all the beasts of the field.
But for Adam no suitable helper was found. 21 So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs and closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.
23 The man said, “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called ‘woman,’ for she was taken out of man.”
24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.
25 The man and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.
Proverbs 18:22
He who finds a wife finds what is good and receives favor from the LORD.
Mark 7:21
For from within, out of men’s hearts, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery…
1 Thessalonians 4:3-5
3 It is God’s will that you should be sanctified: that you should avoid sexual immorality; 4 that each of you should learn to control his own body in a way that is holy and honorable, 5 not in passionate lust like the heathen, who do not know God…
Romans 6:13
Do not offer the parts of your body to sin, as instruments of wickedness, but rather offer yourselves to God, as those who have been brought from death to life; and offer the parts of your body to him as instruments of righteousness.
Romans 13:13
Let us behave decently, as in the daytime, not in orgies and drunkenness, not in sexual immorality and debauchery, not in dissension and jealousy.
1 Corinthians 6:13
“Food for the stomach and the stomach for food”—but God will destroy them both. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body.
1 Corinthians 6:18-19
18 Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body. 19 Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own…
Galatians 5:19-21
19 The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; 20 idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions 21and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.
Colossians 3:5
Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires and greed, which is idolatry.
Revelation 21:8
But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars—their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death.
Revelation 22:15
Outside are the dogs, those who practice magic arts, the sexually immoral, the murderers, the idolaters and everyone who loves and practices falsehood.
Homosexual behavior is always discussed in the Bible as a serious sin. It is often discussed in the context of idolatry. In that context it is listed among other particularly heinous sins as examples of how depraved one can become when idolatry is present. Idolatry is a most serious offense against God, and its seriousness helps explain why homosexual behavior was a capital offense in the Old Testament. Historical Christian interpretation has consistently viewed homosexual behavior as sinful. The modern word sodomy even comes from the biblical account of Sodom and Gomorrah.
But it should be pointed out that what the Bible condemns is not personality traits such as feminine feelings on the part of a man (or masculine feelings on the part of a woman). It condemns the act of homosexual sex.
There are those who take some of the passages of Scripture above and attempt to show that they do not really mean to condemn homosexuality. But these arguments fall short, and upon investigation become an obvious ploy to distort the plain meaning of Scripture. As applies to other doctrines of the Bible, one must avoid trying to interpret Scripture in light of one’s proclivities, and instead, interpret one’s proclivities in light of Scripture. The Bible is the grid. It is wrong to overlay your own grid on the Bible.
Is the biblical view still valid?
One view, that the law in Leviticus was intended for the ancient Hebrews and does not apply today, must be considered. The Old Testament condemns as evil many things that are commonly accepted in the modern world (eating pork, etc.). It is helpful to understand the difference between CIVIL or CEREMONIAL LAWS versus MORAL LAWS in the Bible. While civil or ceremonial laws can and do change from country to country, moral laws do not change because they are rooted in the nature of man. The New Testament repealed various Old Testament ceremonial Jewish laws:
Acts 10:12-15
12 It contained all kinds of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles of the earth and birds of the air. 13 Then a voice told him, “Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.”
14 “Surely not, Lord!” Peter replied. “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean.”
15 The voice spoke to him a second time, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.”
Colossians 2:11-16
11 In him you were also circumcised, in the putting off of the sinful nature, not with a circumcision done by the hands of men but with the circumcision done by Christ, 12 having been buried with him in baptism and raised with him through your faith in the power of God, who raised him from the dead.
13 When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins, 14 having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross. 15 And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.
16 Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day.
Romans 14:17
For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit…
But, the Bible is consistent throughout on moral law, which includes homosexual behavior.
What did Jesus say?
No specific sermon or story that Jesus may have given about specific homosexual behavior is found in Scripture. But an argument from silence would be incorrect. The Bible does not record that Jesus ever mentioned rape, incest, pedophilia, or other blatant sins by name either. But just because Jesus does not mention them, does not imply that we should commit these offenses against God and each other. Jesus is very clear on the proper marriage relationship.
Matthew 19:4-5
“Haven’t you read,” he replied, “that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh?’”
There can be no mistaking what Jesus taught in this regard. In this passage Jesus is reiterating what Moses taught about marriage and family.
Genesis 2:24 (ESV)
Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.
Anything contrary to this—any sexual relationship outside of a committed marriage relationship between one man and one woman—demeans the institution of marriage and is unbiblical.
Jesus was quite clear about his contempt for sexual immorality.
Mark 7:21 (NIV)
For from within, out of men’s hearts, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery…
Jesus’ teaching on moral issues in fact toughened and strengthened them, such as in Matthew 5:27-30 when he expanded our understanding of sexual sin to even lusting in our heart!
Matthew 5:27-30
27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Do not commit adultery.’ 28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29 If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. 30 And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.
Jesus didn’t merely accept people as he found them—he turned people’s lives around. After his encounter with Jesus, the tax collector Zacchaeus pledged to pay back his debts fourfold.
Luke 19:1-10
Zacchaeus the Tax Collector
1 Jesus entered Jericho and was passing through. 2 A man was there by the name of Zacchaeus; he was a chief tax collector and was wealthy. 3 He wanted to see who Jesus was, but being a short man he could not, because of the crowd. 4 So he ran ahead and climbed a sycamore-fig tree to see him, since Jesus was coming that way.
5 When Jesus reached the spot, he looked up and said to him, “Zacchaeus, come down immediately. I must stay at your house today.” 6 So he came down at once and welcomed him gladly.
7 All the people saw this and began to mutter, “He has gone to be the guest of a ’sinner.’”
8 But Zacchaeus stood up and said to the Lord, “Look, Lord! Here and now I give half of my possessions to the poor, and if I have cheated anybody out of anything, I will pay back four times the amount.”
9 Jesus said to him, “Today salvation has come to this house, because this man, too, is a son of Abraham. 10 For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost.”
And Jesus made it clear to the adulteress in John 8 to leave her life of sin.
John 8:1-11
1 But Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. 2 At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them. 3 The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group 4 and said to Jesus, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. 5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?” 6 They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.
But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. 7 When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.” 8 Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.
9 At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there. 10 Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”
11 “No one, sir,” she said.
“Then neither do I condemn you,” Jesus declared. “Go now and leave your life of sin.”
Further, Jesus specifically said that he did not come to abolish the law.
Matthew 5:17
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.”
Jewish law was quite clear on homosexual behavior. To suggest that Jesus would have condoned homosexual behavior is twisting Scripture for political correctness.
The God of the Bible is not merely a God of love and forgiveness. God has characteristics of love AND justice (among others). Jesus, for example, warns about hell more than any other biblical figure! We must not underestimate the holiness of God, who demands right conduct—in fact, perfection.
Matthew 5:48
Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
For examples of the wrath and judgment of God, read: Genesis 2:17; 2 Kings 17:18; Psalm 74:1, 79:5, 90:11; Proverbs 10:16; Micah 7:9; Zephaniah 3:8; Matthew 5:29, 7:13, 25:46; Romans 1:32, 2:8, 6:23; Acts 3:19; 1 Corinthians 6:9; Galatians 6:7-8; Philippians 3:19; 2 Thessalonians 1:9; James 1:15; and Revelation 20:12-15.
There are those who suggest that God is merely a God of love and accepts people just as they are. Certainly that is incorrect. God does not accept us as we are. He demands repentance. We must not create a God to suit ourself. This is idolatry which is a violation of the Second Commandment.
The Theology
The theology of this debate is as old as Adam and Eve. In Genesis 3, when God tells Adam and Eve not to eat the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, the issue was whether Adam and Eve would abide by God’s commands. Adam and Eve decided for themselves what was right when they disobeyed God and ate of the fruit. Ever since that day, mankind has tried to decide for ourselves what is good or bad, in dangerous disregard of God’s command.
Sanctity of Marriage
In recent years, the homosexual movement has centered on giving marriage-like benefits to gay couples. Many in the culture have mistakenly concluded that marriage is merely an institution for the convenience of adults. In actuality, marriage is the bedrock institution for culture to sustain itself through having and nurturing children. There are complementary aspects to a man and woman that are important to the instutution of marriage which go beyond the obvious physical attributes. There are things that a man needs that can only be provided by a woman, and vice versa.
These complementary aspects are important to the relationship of the couple itself, as well as to the children. One does not have to appeal to religion to instinctively understand this. Yet statistics verify the structure of the traditional family as the approach to raising children that gives the best measurable results. The overwhelming body of social science research agrees that children do best when raised in homes with married, opposite-sex parents. Every child has the right to both a mom and a dad.
Yet we cannot divorce the institution of marriage from its theological roots. We acknowledge that marriage is an institution given by God (Genesis 2:24). The Creator of the Universe established the relationship between a man and a woman, thus it is a divine institution, not a human one. To confer marriage-like rights to gays is not the prerogative of people (Matthew 19:6). (This includes civil unions or domestic partnerships, as they are merely marriage by other names.) Defining marriage is the prerogative of God. Whatever may tend to undermine the institution of marriage would also undermine the authority of God, as well as hurt society.
Liberals may argue, “Why should we arbitrarily select only heterosexual couples for marriage? What can it hurt if two homosexuals want to marry?” The answer is surprisingly simple. The institution of marriage between and man a woman is not, in fact, arbitrary. It’s purpose is clear and of utmost importance to society.
David Orland in an article entitled “The Deceit of Gay Marriage” puts it very well. He says:
To justify giving privileges or exemptions or subsidies to some particular group in society, the benefit of doing so for society at large must first be shown. With heterosexual marriage, the case is clear enough. Heterosexual marriage is a matter of genuine social interest because the family is essential to society’s reproduction. The crux of my argument, in other words, was that married couples receive the benefits they do, not because the state is interested in promoting romantic love, or because the Bible says so or because of the influence of special interest groups but rather because the next generation is something that is and should be of interest to all of us. And, by definition, this is not a case that can be made for homosexual unions. To that degree, the attempt to turn the question of domestic partnership into a debate about fairness falls flat.
The more persistent supporters of domestic partnership will of course respond to this argument by pointing to the case in which homosexual partners adopt children or, in the case of lesbians, undergo artificial insemination. The intention here is to show that the nuclear family is found even among homosexual couples and that, to that extent, homosexual unions do indeed meet the same criterion of social interest as heterosexual ones and thus should be granted legal status. It is a weak argument and one that ultimately back-fires on those who employ it. This is for two reasons:
First, adoption by homosexual couples is still exceedingly rare and the law—though many are surprised to learn this—is aimed at the general case. To confer legal benefits on the entire class of would-be homosexual spouses just because some very small minority of this class approximates the pattern of the nuclear family would be a bit like admitting all applicants to a select university on the grounds that a few of them had been shown to meet the entrance requirements.
Second, the right of this small minority to the benefits of marriage is dubious in the extreme. Homosexual “families” of whatever type are always and necessarily parasitic on heterosexual ones.
Every child has the right to a mom and a dad. See 5 Reasons Why Same-Sex Marriage Harms Children.
But homosexuals not only want fair treatment, they are pushing for “Super Rights.” According the Paul Cameron of the Family Research Institute:
“Every member of society has a duty to contribute to the commonwealth. Yet the empirical evidence indicates that those who engage in homosexuality 1) contribute less and cost more in goods and services, 2) disproportionately disrupt social functioning, and 3) have few children while being more apt to harm them. Thus, homosexual practioners not only fail to ‘pay for their keep,’ but by their negative influence on children, cloud society’s future.
Those who engage in homosexuality seek what they say are ‘gay rights.”
In reality, they are demanding Super Rights. Super Rights are those privileges that allow one to ovverride the inalienable rights of other citizens, such as freedom of speech and association. These Super Rights—which are conferred by ‘non-discrimination,’ ‘hate crime,’ and ‘hate speech’ laws—allow homosexuals, if they so choose, to endanger or punish those who would exercise their associational rights to avoid them or protect their children from them.
As an example, empirical studies to date indicate that a male teacher who practices homosexuality is the most likely kind of teacher to sexually molest students. A principal knowing this may not want to hire a teacher who declares his homosexual interests. But if that teacher wants the job, his Super Rights trump the associational rights of the principal as well as the right of students not to experience extra risk (especially since safety is part of their right to life). Parents renting out one side of their duplex may not want to place their children at risk by renting to a gay couple. But if—even on a whim — the homosexuals want the duplex, their Super Rights trump the property and associational rights of the parents as well as their children’s right not to be exposed to potential molestation.
The Super Rights of homosexual practitioners also squelch the right of others to freedom of speech. If a broadcaster opines that homosexual sex is dangerous, but a homosexual finds such speech ‘offensive,’ his Super Rights trump the broadcaster’s freedom of speech and the broadcaster may be fined or imprisoned.”
The concept of hate crimes seems particularly reprehensible. If one of your (heterosexual) loved ones is the object of a despicable crime, the perpetrator would receive a lesser punishment than someone who committed the same act against someone who practices homosexual sex!
Born That Way
The issue of special rights for homosexuals hinges in part on the notion that the trait is genetic. To date there is no credible evidence to support this view, though many have been searching for a gay gene for years. There have been three “studies” which were once cited to suggest an inherited homosexual trait, but all three have been scientifically discredited. (One of these was the 1991 study by Simon LeVay. Another was a study by J.M. Baily and R.C. Pillard in 1991. The third was the Dean Hamer study in 1993.) See Born Gay Hoax. Note this is a link to Chapter 3 of Ryan Sorba’s book. You can click at the top to see other chapters.
The medical and scientific evidence suggest that indeed, there is no such thing as “homosexuality,” in the sense of genetic determination. Indeed, some in the homosexual community are now acknowledging that there is no “gay gene.” See Activist Acknowledgment.
Those who insist on a genetic cause must answer an obvious question. Whenever we hear of someone who says that so-and-so was “born gay,” we ask, “Which parent did he inherit his homosexuality from?” Obviously, homosexuals do not propogate themselves. Wouldn’t natural selection have eleminated any gene that resisted propogation from the population?
Then what does cause homosexual tendencies? Many who have counselled people who practice homosexuality are convinced that in most cases there has been a serious and extreme loss of confidence in own’s manhood (or womanhood). This may have been the result of extremely detached parenting (especially from the father), from some other person who had a major influence at a young age, childhood sexual encounters, etc.
There may be other factors involved. For example, a boy may not have the talent or inclination to be successful in athletics, for which a high view is placed in our society. So, he may infer from this that he is not manly enough. One man testifies that it was gay pornography that led him into the lifestyle.
But some admit the reason they got into the homosexual lifestyle was simply because of its availability. More and more, representatives of the gay community are acknowledging that homosexual behavior is simply a choice. Gareth Kirkby of Xtra West, a gay publication, said that there is no longer any need to lie about it. He admits that he freely chose the lifestyle. See also http://www.queerbychoice.com/.
Those in the gay lifestyle can and do come out of it. Various studies show that success rates of those wanting to leave the lifestyle range from 30% to 70%. It is, no doubt, difficult to leave the lifestyle. One reason it is so difficult is because of its addictive nature. For stories of those who have left the homosexual lifestyle, see the Exodus International link at the bottom of this article.
Even if it were shown that there is a genetic component to homosexuality, that would still not make it right. Compare, for example, alcoholism. It is generally believed that there is an inherited tendency for alcoholism. But that inherited tendency does not condone the behavior, nor does one who inherits the trait necessarily become addicted to alcohol. Society tries to compassionately help those caught in that addiction. While difficult, many people inflicted with alcoholism are successful in reforming their lives.
All human beings are faced with sexual temptation of some sort during their lifetime. Homosexual attractions and temptations are not exempted, just as adultery is not exempted from being sinful behavior. As heterosexuals, we argue that we ourselves have a tendency—which we are certain is genetically inherited—to want to cheat on our spouse. This desire is quite strong. Yet we do not act on this desire and are able to suppress it.
Many young people go through a normal period of examining their sexuality. If during this period society tells them that homosexual conduct is okay, they may be encouraged to try it. This experimentation may lead to a lifestyle that would not otherwise occur if the cultural mandate were not present.
Here are some interesting statistics to consider:
• Around a third of gays, and many lesbians, say that they were “seduced,” “molested,” or persuaded by either formal or informal association into becoming participants in homosexuality. Many males who engage in same-sex sex claim they were “made compulsively homosexual” by seduction/molestation.
• Probably at least a third of children raised by a homosexual parent also take up the practice.
• A boy raised through teen years in a city is three times more apt to engage in homosexuality than a boy raised in rural areas.
We also refer the reader to The Born Gay Hoax.
Ravages of the Lifestyle
Today’s society is lying to us about homosexuality. We are told that it is biblical—clearly incorrect. We are told that it is genetic—no evidence for it. And we are told that it can be a beautiful and loving lifestyle—wrong again.
Statistics show that homosexual behavior is marked by death, disease, disappointment, promiscuity, perversity, addiction, and misery. The real threat to persons in the homosexual lifestyle does not seem to be discrimination, but physical devastation.
Please note—the purpose of our web site is to present the testimony and evidence as best we know it. The statistics below are harsh. If you have contrary evidence, we would be glad for you to provide it. Here are a few of the available statistics:
• The best available evidence indicates that those practicing homosexual behavior have a 20% to 30% shorter life expectancy than the rest of the population, not even accounting for death from AIDS.
• 25% to 33% of people in the homosexual lifestyle are alcoholics compared to 7% in the general population.
• Most people in the homosexual lifestyle are loving and caring. But we cannot merely sweep under the rug the statistics that indicate that homosexuals are 16 times more likely than heterosexuals to molest a child and 15 times more likely to murder.
• In addition to increased molestation, empirical research shows that children of a homosexual couple have more frequent harms such as social difficulties, emotional turmoil, gender role disruption, etc.
• For further statistics, see the educational pamphlet Medical
Consequences of What Homosexuals Do. (This pamphlet, as well as others available from the Family Research Institute, are excellent to distribute at your workplace if you are forced to attend an indoctrination on homosexuality!) They are available at this website: Family Research Institute
The pathology of homosexual practice gives the reason for many of the ravages of this lifestyle. In a 1991 paper by James Holsinger Jr, a physician nominated for the post of Surgeon General, explained that the structure and function of the male and female reproductive systems are fully complementary. But the rectum is incapable of mechanical protection against severe damage. Not only is the rectum not lubricated, but the anal sphincters are designed for only the outward passage of objects.
Holsinger stated, “From the perspective of pathology and pathophysiology, the varied sexual practices of homosexual men have resulted in a diverse and expanded concept of sexually transmitted disease and associated trauma.” Among items in a long list of problems listed by Holsinger are these: enteric diseases (infections from a variety of viruses and bacteria including a very high incidence of amoebiasis, giardiasis, and hepatitis, etc.), trauma (fecal incontinence, anal fissure, rectosigmoid tears, chemical sinusitis, etc.), sexually trasmitted diseases (AIDS, gonorrhea, simplex infections, genital warts, scabies, etc.).
The following link is an open admission from a homosexual male regarding the norm in this lifestyle: Self Destruction.
Additional documentation for the statistics given in this section are available upon request.
A Loving Lifestyle?
Homosexual activists and often the uninformed media leave us with the impression that the gay lifestyle is filled with love and tenderness. No doubt this is often true. But statistics, again, show another reality.
Life-long monogamy is nearly non-existent among those in a homosexual lifestyle, including those who profess to be “married.” Promiscuity is rampant. Many contacts are between strangers with 70% of gays estimating that they had sex only once with over half of their partners. Various studies indicate that gays average somewhere between 10 and 110 different sex partners per year. A 1981 study found that only 2% of homosexuals could be classified as monogamous or even semi-monogamous (having 10 or fewer lifetime sexual partners.)
Gay researchers McWhirter and Mattison studied 156 gay male couples whose relationship lasted from 1 to 37 years. They found that all the couples whose relationships lasted more than 5 years incorporated some provision for outside sexual activity. There was not a single long-term monogamous couple.
Gay marriage has been legal in the Netherlands long enough to gather data on it. A 2003 study found the average duration of “steady” male partnerships to range from .75 to 2.25 years. These “steady” relationships had an average of 8 casual partners in addition to the significant other each year.
The sin of promiscuity is an aspect of heterosexual behavior as well. But statistics indicate that it is a far greater factor in the gay lifestyle.
It can be said with impunity that what advocates of gay marriage really want is not just marriage rights. They want a world without any sexual inhibitions or limitations.
A Way Out?
Many people in the homosexual lifestyle are saying that what they want is acceptance. But those who have counselled homosexuals say that they often reveal a deeper desire of wanting out of the problem.
What does our compassion as Christians demand? Our concern is marked by a broken-hearted grieving over the condition of the sinner. Shouldn’t our mercy and love be to help bring the lives of everyone into conformity with the will of God? The evidence supports our confidence that God’s commands are not arbitrary, but that they are for our own good. Studies consistenly support the idea that, on average, those persons who are living a biblical lifestyle have happier, more successful, and healthier lives than those who do not. This includes having a more satifying sex life!
If you are caught up in the homosexual lifestyle, we suggest to you that the loss of confidence in your gender was probably from someone who convinced you of such. But God does not see you that way! He sees you as the man (or woman) that he made you. If you have a problem, it is one of authority.
Jesus changes people from the inside out. There is no hope for a broken world or a broken life other than through Jesus. Through Jesus, there is hope for us all. We recommend visiting the following websites for further information:
• Exodus International
• Homosexuals Anonymous
• Pro-Family Index
God loves each of us no matter how often and blatantly we have sinned against him and our fellow man. He loves us so much that he wants what is best for us. God does not lower his standards just because we fail so often. God provides perfection and pardon for us through his Son, Jesus Christ. To learn more see our Christian Cram Course.
Reference to this information can be found at: http://www.faithfacts.org